You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
| | |
Model 1
|
Time interactiond
|
Model 2
|
Time interactiond
|
|---|
|
IRR (95% CI)
|
p-valuec
|
IRR (95% CI)
|
p-valuec
|
|---|
|
Level change
|
Predicted cases (n)
| | | | | | |
|
Pre-SUFA
|
58.7 (Dec 2013)
|
1.00
| | |
1.00
| | |
|
Post-SUFA
|
60.5 (Jan 2014)
|
1.04 (0.95, 1.13)
|
0.445
| |
0.77 (0.69, 0.86)
|
< 0.001
| |
|
Slope
|
Predicted cases/month (n)
| | | | | | |
|
Pre-SUFA (per month)
|
47.1 (Jan 2011-Dec 2013)
|
1.01 (1.01, 1.02)
|
< 0.001
| |
0.97 (0.97, 0.98)
|
< 0.001
| |
|
Post-SUFA (per month)
|
56.3 (Jan 2014-Dec 2016)
|
1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
|
< 0.001
| |
0.99 (0.98, 0.99)
|
< 0.001
| |
|
Slope change
|
|
Time × SUFA
| |
0.98 (0.98–0.99)
| |
< 0.001
|
1.01 (1.01–1.02)
| |
< 0.001
|
- IRR Incidence rate ratio
- aLevel change assesses the relative change in tests per month immediately post SUFA intervention
- . bSlope change tests the relative change in the monthly trend between pre and post SUFA. Model 1 includes fixed effects for SUFA, time and SUFA x time interaction and a random effect for site. Model 2 = Model 1 + additional adjustment for population at risk (the HIV tests performed for each district site)
- cEstimated using a mixed effects negative binomial regression model
- . dP-value for the SUFA x Time interaction