You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Characteristics of AGYW customers
|
All AGYW (n = 56)
|
By interest in PrEP (either form)a
|
p valueb
|
|---|
|
Some interest (n = 39)
|
No interest (n = 16)
|
|---|
|
Age in years, median (IQR)
|
17 (16–19)
|
17 (16–21)
|
16 (15.5–17)
|
0.053
|
|
Currently in school
| | | |
0.072
|
|
Yes
|
34 (61%)
|
21 (54%)
|
13 (81%)
| |
|
No
|
22 (39%)
|
18 (46%)
|
3 (19%)
| |
|
Highest/current education level
| | | |
0.438
|
|
Primary school or no level completed
|
7 (13%)
|
6 (15%)
|
1 (6%)
| |
|
Some secondary school
|
37 (66%)
|
24 (62%)
|
13 (81%)
| |
|
Secondary school
|
12 (21%)
|
9 (23%)
|
2 (12%)
| |
|
Have job or earn money
| | | |
0.304
|
|
Yes
|
13 (23%)
|
11 (28%)
|
2 (12%)
| |
|
No
|
43 (77%)
|
28 (72%)
|
14 (88%)
| |
|
Relationship status
| | | |
0.047
|
|
Single
|
27 (48%)
|
16 (41%)
|
11 (69%)
| |
|
Married or steady partner
|
16 (29%)
|
14 (36%)
|
1 (6%)
| |
|
Casual or multiple partner(s)
|
13 (23%)
|
9 (23%)
|
4 (25%)
| |
|
Have children
| | | |
0.046
|
|
Yes
|
10 (18%)
|
9 (23%)
|
0 (0%)
| |
|
No
|
46 (82%)
|
30 (77%)
|
16 (100%)
| |
|
Household food insecurity
| | | |
1.000
|
|
Little to no household hunger
|
45 (80%)
|
31 (79%)
|
13 (81%)
| |
|
Moderate/severe household hunger
|
11 (20%)
|
8 (21%)
|
3 (19%)
| |
|
Distance to shop in minutes, median (IQR)
|
10 (5–20)
|
12.5 (7.5–17.5)
|
10 (5–25)
|
0.896
|
|
Reason for shop visit
| | | |
0.519
|
|
SRH product(s)
|
14 (25%)
|
9 (23%)
|
5 (31%)
| |
|
Other
|
42 (75%)
|
30 (77%)
|
11 (69%)
| |
|
Previously aware of HIV prevention drugs
| | | |
0.478
|
|
Yes
|
11 (20%)
|
9 (23%)
|
2 (13%)
| |
|
No or unsure
|
45 (80%)
|
30 (77%)
|
14 (88%)
| |
- aAGYW characteristics are stratified by some interest or no interest in at least one form of PrEP (either oral PrEP or the dapivirine ring). One AGYW customer responded “don’t know/no response” to the questions about interest in using oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring
- bFor categorical variables, p values from Fisher exact tests are presented. For continuous variables, p values from Kruskal–Wallis tests are presented. Significant associations (at α = 0.05) are shown in bold
